Starting Over Talk - Peer Coaching Support Site

I think you got excited about that one, honeyb. (By the way, all caps means you are yelling at us. Please don't yell at us. Thanks!)

Thank you for the link to the interesting article, HD. It will be interesting to see how this one ends up!

Where is the article link? I would like to see it.

Never mind, I see the link now.

Anyone notice how uncomfortable Christina looked today when Dr. Stan did the boundry circle exerscise with her?
She looked a little miffed - like he shouldn't be "going there". What does everyone else think? Was Dr. Stan overstepping his boundry with the boundry exerscise?

And the lime green shirt! All I could think of when I saw it was Sinae's comment from last season, "Dr Stan what I learned from you is that it's ok not to match..."

honeyspur wrote:

QUOTE:
And the lime green shirt! All I could think of when I saw it was Sinae's comment from last season, "Dr Stan what I learned from you is that it's ok not to match..."

i thought of the same thing when Dr. Stan walked in wearing that lime green shirt

i also noticed how uncomfortable Christina was during the boundary exercise...but i am very glad that Dr. Stan did the exercise with her...

Oh boy, that doesn't look good. It also explains why Dr. Stan asked Tess last season if her molestation really happened. This sent up a red flag, but this article bolster's my suspicion that this guy may be a hired gun for accused pedophiles. I think this is one area where one really can't be on both sides of the fence. You have to make a decision what your mission is; to help the survivors of such abuse or to help perpetrators. I must say this information definitely leaves me wondering about just which side Dr. Stan is on. There are some issues where I think it depends on the individual case as to who's right and who's wrong, but I just cannot support defending pedophiles in court. I know that under our constitution somebody has to do it but I'd personally rather spend my time and energy defending and supporting those who have been on the receiving end of such crimes.

I agree that Michael Jackson is not your typical profile for a pedophile, but I believe he did it and that his child-like mind-set actually created a rationalization for doing it. If one believes they themself are a child then it goes to follow that that person would view sexual encounters with children as merely innocent experimentation or play, but if that's the case then this is an even more dangerous person than one who fully understands his crime. You've got a child in an adult's body, and this is a prescription for repeat offense. Without insight there can be no change.

And I agree with the statement above; I would have hoped Dr. Stan could be more discerning than that and not view Michael as the victim.

Well another epoisode is on in just a minute, so will catch you guys later.

Today's should be interesting.

Giftbearer